Question

Nov. 9th, 2006 02:09 pm
emony: (Light)
[personal profile] emony
Net neutrality.

Any thoughts?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gobsmackit.livejournal.com
It scares the crap out of me. The lack of neutrality, anyway. I love Ted Kennedy (http://youtube.com/watch?v=6UlCXXZTTh8). My senator. ♥

AND ALSO: apparently the Democrat that could become the new chair on the subcommitte on Internet and IP is in with the MPAA (movies) and the RIAA (music) - damn Texan Democrats, most of them might as well be Republicans - but hopefully he'll get juggled off to another committee, because the next dude in line is Rick Boucher, who's alll about consumer rights (which I'd think would go along with the ideals of net neutrality) and wants to reform the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998.

Longest. Sentence. Ever. XD

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gobsmackit.livejournal.com
*who could become the new chair. I may run on, but I don't want to sound like a complete idiot.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emony.livejournal.com
Interesting. Thanks :) It seems to be much more of a US issue than an issue over here, so far, but we're looking at it for a work thing, so I thought I'd canvass for opinions/thoughts. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] and-i.livejournal.com
It worries me that you can so easily get from lack of net neutrality to restriction of the freedom of information. There's a soapbox in there somewhere for when I actually work out what it's all about. It's one of those terms I've heard bandied about mostly by people who don't have a much deeper understanding about it than I do. Probably because it hasn't really become a Great Issue over here. Or if it has, I've managed to miss it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-09 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emony.livejournal.com
It is a bit of a confusing issue, because it sounds like one thing, but there are stands and strains involved in it. It's not really a massive concern over here, because over various techy things like local loop unbundling creating a very competitive market for telecoms and broadband provision, but it's possible that what happens in the US could affect us, or things over here could change, so we'll see. Thanks :)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-10 03:58 am (UTC)
xochiquetzl: Claudia from Warehouse 13 (Default)
From: [personal profile] xochiquetzl
Very important. Some big media/ISP conglomerates are trying to get legislation passed that does the opposite--that makes sites load fast if they pay your ISP, and everyone else load like molasses.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-11 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emony.livejournal.com
Are they actually trying to get anti-NN legislation through? I though they'd just failed to get pro-NN legislation passed?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-11 07:25 pm (UTC)
xochiquetzl: Claudia from Warehouse 13 (Default)
From: [personal profile] xochiquetzl
Yeah, they had both up in congress for awhile. I think the anti-NN legislation went through in the house and died in the senate, or vice versa.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-10 11:32 am (UTC)
jcalanthe: bucky saying "mmmmmonkeys!" (mmmonkeys)
From: [personal profile] jcalanthe
Yay net neutrality!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-11 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] emony.livejournal.com
Heh, quite.

Profile

emony: (Default)
Emony

August 2009

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
161718192021 22
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags